Bookmark Jamaica-Gleaner.com
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
Profiles in Medicine
The Star
E-Financial Gleaner
Overseas News
The Voice
Communities
Hospitality Jamaica
Google
Web
Jamaica- gleaner.com

Archives
1998 - Now (HTML)
1834 - Now (PDF)
Services
Find a Jamaican
Careers
Library
Power 106FM
Weather
Subscriptions
News by E-mail
Newsletter
Print Subscriptions
Interactive
Chat
Dating & Love
Free Email
Guestbook
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
WebCam
Weekly Poll
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Contact Us
Other News
Stabroek News

Life of Jamaica (LoJ) breaks silence - Insurance company expresses disappointment at Cabinet decision to re-tender GEASO health scheme
published: Wednesday | December 19, 2007

Tyrone Reid, Enterprise Reporter


BYLES

After months of silence amid raging debates over the awarding of the $2 billion per annum Government Employee Administrative Staff Only (GEASO) health-scheme contract, Life of Jamaica (LoJ) has finally broken its code of silence.

In a Gleaner exclusive, the life and health-insurance company expressed displeasure at the Cabinet decision to put the 65,000-strong GEASO health-scheme contract back to public tender and has charged that the move extends the period that the multibillion-dollar contract has not benefited from open bidding.

Recently Contractor-General Greg Christie said that the Government's decision to put the health-scheme contract to tender again is perpetuating the illegal holding of the contract by current provider, Blue Cross of Jamaica. Mr. Christie's last annual report revealed that the GEASO contract - which is the single largest health-insurance scheme in the country - was not put to tender for 10 consecutive years (1995-2005).

Mr. Christie has argued that not following through on the Ministry of Finance's recommendation and the National Contracts Commission's (NCC) subsequent endorsement to award the contract to LoJ, would deal a devastating blow to the country's already wounded-contract awards process.

When contacted yesterday, Mr. Christie told our news team that his office had not received any communication from the Government detailing the reasons behind the decision to put the contract back on the bidding block. "We have received nothing, absolutely nothing from the Government," he stressed.

Process was flawed

Earlier this year, the NCC-endorsed Ministry of Finance recommendation was not approved by the previous Cabinet because the members of the GEASO monitoring committee insisted that the process was flawed and that Blue Cross of Jamaica should remain as the carriers. At the time, the Jamaica Teachers' Association questioned the reasoning behind the Government's decision to go against the recommendation of the actuaries it had hired to scrutinise the bids.

While LoJ stressed that it strongly supported the Government's procurement procedures, the company pointed out that this was the first time it would be subjected to a re-tender.

"We strongly believe in the bidding process that ensures transparency, equity and competitive pricing."

"Through this process, LoJ has won and lost many contracts over the years; however, this is the first occasion in which the outcome has resulted in a re-tender," the company explained.

Richard Byles, president and CEO of LoJ, told The Gleaner that his company played by the rules. "We have observed every requirement of the bidding process and were very pleased to see that our bid was the most cost effective and would have resulted in substantial savings to taxpayers," he said.

While disappointed with the outcome of the bid, LoJ said it remained committed to the highest levels of transparency and awaited the formal request for re-tender.

At the same time, Dr. Henry Lowe, president of Blue Cross of Jamaica, said the Government and the GEASO monitoring committee/unions were their clients and he believed "that they are working it out together among themselves to decide what is in their best interest for the future".

"Consequently, we are not in a position to make any further comment at this time," he said.

tyrone.reid@gleanerjm.com

More News



Print this Page

Letters to the Editor

Most Popular Stories





© Copyright 1997-2007 Gleaner Company Ltd.
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions | Add our RSS feed
Home - Jamaica Gleaner